Feminists are as strong as men, they are equal, they can do all the male jobs (not keen on the glass cellar ones) and they are out there kicking male butt - or being hideously misandrist as we call it round here. But feminists are also soft, fragile, in need of protection. Even as much as a glance can reduce them to trembling panic. They are entitled to have any feelings they have about male intentions taken as fact. Due process? No!  Perhaps a return to the Olde England days of chaperones might be needed? Feminists truly do need protection against the merest glance from men. They never do wrong themselves, women don't, and there is not a hint of misandry, neurosis or narcissism in their attitudes. Of course, the skewed and cherry picked stats, the Patriarchy myth and all the paraphernalia of the Feminist ideology helps them immensely in gaining highly unreasonable support from men - who, oddly enough, seem to want to meet women's every demand, even when it's stark staring ...

Karen demonstrates the odious practices of Feminists and law makers in the USA and England and Wales (the 'UK' Supreme Court, a grandiose title, does not cover the whole of the UK). Under the likes of narcissistic Feminists like Baroness Hale, we've had nothing but the lies and nonsense and systemic discrimination against men. Hale has gone now, but the last time we saw her online, she was still terribly smug and pleased with herself. And what's all this about female primary school teachers favouring their own gender when it comes to grading work by pupils, as compared to 'gender blinded' grading studies?