We don't like Gad Saad here particularly. We find him arrogant, pretentious and rather too fond of himself. We agree with some of what he says, disagree with others, but it's his attitude of being part of some kind of elite 'bubble' which turns us off. However, live and let live and usually we just ignore him. But when he describes people concerned about male genital mutilation, circumcision, an unnecessary operation which actually kills some infant boys, as 'imbeciles' we break our silence.  Gad looks down from on high. He's an academic he often tells us, he moves in the world of academia. Sadly, that is no indication of intelligence or compassion. We're tired of people like Gad. It's not that we're against academics speaking out on issues. Janice Fiamengo, for example, is a professor of English - but she is first and foremost a person and of the people not floating above. We like her online presence and find her research fascinating and often

The dreadful WASPI women who want money from the State for having retirement age equalised make me sick to my stomach. Once again, that sense of privilege and purveying of a false victimhood narrative which colours all things feminist are glaringly obvious. In the UK, men had to retire five years later than women, thus paying much more into the system and yet had/have shorter life expectancy (ever looked at the workplace death gap - 95% male?) and did/do the vast majority of dirty and dangerous jobs. Most women I know in that age bracket are not WASPIs. They knew the change was coming - it WAS widely proclaimed - and they don't expect continued privilege. What is it with these dreadful, manipulative WASPIs? Or feminism in general. Of course, chivalrous men will ride in to supply their every little whim. And the money will come from men too - as they paid far more into the system. Many of us see WASPIs for exactly for what they are, as will history.

 Martin Decoder on YouTube makes for an interesting listen as he dissects the way people talk, the meanings behind what they say.  In the case of someone like Natalie Portman, the findings are not attractive. She's one of the many spoilt, misandrist feminists out there. She makes sweeping statements, doesn't back them up, and pretends that areas in which women are a minority is down to discrimination. Equity stinks, Natalie - and as the Patriarchy you proclaim is and was a myth, people who waste time on your hate and narcissism get all they deserve.  One area Natalie neglects to mention in which men are far more highly represented than women is the glass cellar jobs.  As she pretends to be looking at things gender-wide, this is a glaring omission. Come on, Natalie, get down there and do your bit to keep the infrastructure going, so you can go on spouting your hateful nonsense in the comfort you take for granted. But perhaps you wouldn't be so inclined to misandristic, narci