Martin Decoder on YouTube makes for an interesting listen as he dissects the way people talk, the meanings behind what they say.  In the case of someone like Natalie Portman, the findings are not attractive. She's one of the many spoilt, misandrist feminists out there. She makes sweeping statements, doesn't back them up, and pretends that areas in which women are a minority is down to discrimination. Equity stinks, Natalie - and as the Patriarchy you proclaim is and was a myth, people who waste time on your hate and narcissism get all they deserve.  One area Natalie neglects to mention in which men are far more highly represented than women is the glass cellar jobs.  As she pretends to be looking at things gender-wide, this is a glaring omission. Come on, Natalie, get down there and do your bit to keep the infrastructure going, so you can go on spouting your hateful nonsense in the comfort you take for granted. But perhaps you wouldn't be so inclined to misandristic...

The 29% increase in rough sleepers in London is mainly men. So, what is St Mungo's doing? And isn't her make-up perfect? The vast majority of those sleeping rough are men. It is so. Even the odd statistic below stating 1 in 4 homeless (not necessarily sleeping rough) are women doesn't match my personal experience. I've known of exactly three women sleeping rough in my fifty seven years on the planet - and one did it as a rebellious teenager, seeking experience and then dropped it like a hot potato. And I've known about the same number of 'homeless' women, staying with friends/relatives. So, even if 1 in 4 homeless are women, shouldn't that be 3 in 4 homeless are men? The MAJORITY? And is the so-called homeless stat being contributed to by the 'invisible homeless' - those (largely women) staying with friends/relatives, and not on the freezing streets?  It's not that homelessness shouldn't be addressed, it should, but isn't being on the...