Mad Dogs and Englishmen? In this case it's Mad Dogs and an Englishwoman! Jess Phillips spews a load of emotional vitriol and misandry and gets away with it every time. Women's own group bias and male chivalry see to that. The so-called 'UK' Parliament (asymmetric national devolution) has become a nightmare. Jess likes to make out she has a UK remit (calling an absurd 'national emergency'), but her powers only extend to England and Wales. Apologies to the sensitive if this blog post seems a little ranty. Jess Phillips is highly emotional and proudly 'gobby' when it comes to her own agenda, so I've echoed her style a little - but with far more objectivity!  By the way, I'm an old socialist, not 'Right Wing'. The modern day is so lazy in classifying people who don't blindly follow the herd and go 'baaa' in time with each other. English MP Jess Phillips is mad. She was weaned (workwise) on misandrist dogma, and is now a ranting, h...

Albert Square - AKA the 'Misandry Mile' - like most UK soap operas. EastEnders , the BBC's 'flagship' soap has just done a 'deep dive' into the 'manosphere'. Oh, great. Men's rights, misandry, Warren Farrell, Karen Straughan, William Collins and Janice Fiamengo? Nope. It was a misandrist hatchet job, designed to show that women and girls are perfect, 'oppressed' lovelies, and all men's problems are their own fault. The Nazi-esque, gender narcissism of women and the devout chivalry of men. Fortunately, not many people watch EastEnders or the documentary, which was a bizarre concoction of misandry and a parody of serious reporting. Misogyny? Criticising a female politician and any male act that disagrees with feminism. Misandry? Ignoring the fact that men do the vast majority of glass cellar jobs which uphold our infrastructure, are 95% of workplace deaths, suffer domestic violence with hardly any shelters for them - or their children, ...

Do not make negative views about trendy, misandrist, equity not equality, and therefore racist initiatives - which purport to be the opposite - public at Duke Divinity School. You will be demonised and ousted by the self-regarding, 'proud', hate-riddled ideologues running the show, like Duke Dean Professor Elaine Heath. Professor Heath was apparently 'proud' to be hosting a woke, ideology-ridden, misandrist initiative at Duke. Isn't pride a sin according to the Christian faith? Watch the video presented by Janice Fiamengo. Do YOU think Professor Heath has anything to be proud of in this matter?

If a young man and woman are drunk and sexual acts occur, does this mean that the man is guilty of rape?  The hateful feminist rhetoric that all heterosexual sex is violence against women is absurd. It's all very well to be a hate-consumed woman who takes her bile out on the male sex, but not terribly practical to endorse her views when it comes to continuing the species. A lot of the women behind the feminist rage are of this ilk, seeking to demonise men and brainwash other women. And chivalrous men, rushing to the party, desperate to pedestal women, are no help at all. Janice Fiamengo reviews one case in which the men was 'responsible', a 'rapist', and served prison time with a permanent stain on his character, and the woman was a completely innocent 'victim'. This is not justice.

Feminists are as strong as men, they are equal, they can do all the male jobs (not keen on the glass cellar ones) and they are out there kicking male butt - or being hideously misandrist as we call it round here. But feminists are also soft, fragile, in need of protection. Even as much as a glance can reduce them to trembling panic. They are entitled to have any feelings they have about male intentions taken as fact. Due process? No!  Perhaps a return to the Olde England days of chaperones might be needed? Feminists truly do need protection against the merest glance from men. They never do wrong themselves, women don't, and there is not a hint of misandry, neurosis or narcissism in their attitudes. Of course, the skewed and cherry picked stats, the Patriarchy myth and all the paraphernalia of the Feminist ideology helps them immensely in gaining highly unreasonable support from men - who, oddly enough, seem to want to meet women's every demand, even when it's stark staring ...

In Episode 28 of the Fiamengo File , Professor Fiamengo discusses the modus operandi used by feminists to silence or destroy their critics. The example of Sage Gerard, who endured years of organized persecution at the hands of faculty at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, is used as a case study.

Things ain't what they used to be! But is the past as we see it actually what it was? No. Feminism is a major example of how history is distorted and ideologies like feminism produce fresh nightmare eras, revelled in by the unjust.

Trying to attend a talk on men's issues in a higher education institution can easily result in being told you are 'F***** scum' by extremely entitled, brainwashed and bigoted students. This is the state of our universities. The hate religion of feminism rules, having taken the already gynocentric nature of our society to ridiculous extremes. Janice Fiamengo shares her experiences as a fledgling men's rights champion.

Apparently, women undervalue themselves when it comes to workplace salaries. Or do they? While it fits the constant harping and hate of the feminist movement to shriek this view, is it really true? And, if women as qualified and committed as men will ask for less, why don't companies simply employ only women and save oodles of dosh?

Janice Fiamengo, a retired professor of English from Canada, looks at the continued pandering to women in the academic world. Unproveable "feelings" matter incredibly here in producing new initiatives, not facts like women outnumbering men at universities. Misandry and pandering to feminist ideology on a butty. This video dates from 2016, but is every bit as relevant today, as Janice lays bare the facts behind these odious initiatives.

We have a great deal of time for English researcher Rick Bradford and his Illustrated Empathy Gap website. Here, Rick discusses his thoughts and findings with Tom Golden and Janice Fiamengo. Highly recommended, but you need a cuppa and to be prepared to listen and concentrate. Web skimming? Not for this.

The hate ideologies of feminism and intersectional feminism plus the hateful and narcissistic attitudes of feminist students and the grovelling/chivalrous postures of their male supporters stop groups from forming to discuss male issues. Admit to your male privilege (what is that?) and leave things alone. Feminists are the only worthy group.  The only group ALLOWED. Feminism is THE ideology and is unquestionable. Women are the ones who were oppressed and are gentle, loving and morally superior. Really? Heaven knows what their forebears would have done without men to provide for and protect them. Privilege? Balderdash. Feminism is akin to Nazism. Hate groups always pick out certain demographics to focus on. What these purveyors of hate would do in the modern world without men in the glass cellar jobs maintaining the infrastructure need not be considered. More privilege, you see. If it wasn't for the fact that men have always done the ghastly jobs which keep the comfortable world we ...

Feminists see glass ceilings, never glass cellars, and the world as being pitched against women. Studies by researchers with Feminist underpinnings, with no male equivalent studies, paint vivid and nonsensical pictures of poor, oppressed women, with preferred hiring practices firmly in place. Meanwhile, the infrastructure, which makes these entitled whinings possible, is largely maintained by men in glass cellar jobs.

Former Vancouver Canucks captain Trevor Linden has joined a YWCA campaign on domestic violence, which claims female victims of intimate partner violence suffer traumatic brain injury at a much higher rate than professional hockey players. Writer and retired professor Janice Fiamengo of The Fiamengo Files joined True North’s Andrew Lawton to point out the “false numbers and shameful misrepresentations” behind the campaign.

 We don't like Gad Saad here particularly. We find him arrogant, pretentious and rather too fond of himself. We agree with some of what he says, disagree with others, but it's his attitude of being part of some kind of elite 'bubble' which turns us off. However, live and let live and usually we just ignore him. But when he describes people concerned about male genital mutilation, circumcision, an unnecessary operation which actually kills some infant boys, as 'imbeciles' we break our silence.  Gad looks down from on high. He's an academic he often tells us, he moves in the world of academia. Sadly, that is no indication of intelligence or compassion. We're tired of people like Gad. It's not that we're against academics speaking out on issues. Janice Fiamengo, for example, is a professor of English - but she is first and foremost a person and of the people not floating above. We like her online presence and find her research fascinating and often...

Janice Fiamengo takes the instance of the Irish Government using taxpayers' money to create female-only academic roles to expand on the whole sexist and immoral realm of affirmative action. Janice, a former professor of English, is an academic with a genuinely enquiring mind and a level of objectivity and compassion rarely publicly displayed by those in the ivory towers of academe when it comes to sex and gender.

Professor of English, Janice Fiamengo, began as a committed feminist. But gradually began to question the ideology, and has ended up completely disavowing it. Her studies of feminism's history make fascinating reading. Here, she looks at the 1960s - with privileged women like Betty Friedan. Gloria Steinem and Kate Millet coming forward to shape the Second Wave, while men in the glass cellar jobs, making their privileged world of illusion and hate possible, died in great numbers - completely ignored.

Feminism was once absolutely justified, wasn't it? After all, men had the vote and lorded it over women - and they'd done so for thousands of years. This was the ridiculous story sold to the world by Feminists from the get-go, and its acceptance by society then and now shows the ridiculous and highly dangerous levels of gynocentrism in society. So, what was it really all about? Listen to Canadian professor of English Janice Fiamengo, one of our favourite men's advocates.

Simone De Beauvoir's book,  The Second Sex, is still a major influence on Feminism. It's potty and twisted (my words) - and Janice Fiamengo has a far better head for talking about and analysing it than me.