The femosphere is so much worse than the manosphere as it is part of the system. It's fine. Men and boys are monsters.   UN Women's view on the earthquakes in Venezuela? Centre women and girls when rescuing. And the vast majority of rescuers are men! Centre your superiors, not everybody in need of help. Earthquakes do not discriminate, but UN Women do. This organisation, which we are FORCED to sponsor, routinely demonizes men and boys and discriminates against them. Female organisations can post things like this, quite without fear of censure. It's accepted. No wild screams of 'MISANDRY!' Women's own group bias and male deference to females takes care of that. This is horrifying. So glad to see the readers' community note at the end. Our heartfelt sympathy to Venezuelans at this terrible time, regardless of gender.  

Like its partner in crime, EastEnders , Coronation Street is now walking the Misandry Mile with a story about domestic violence in a male gay relationship. Actually male gays have the least violent relationships, Lesbian relationships are far more prone to it. But Corrie couldn't show that, could it? And that all this violence was taking place in a flat above the Corner Shop, a bustling hub of local business? Yeah, OK. And the character, Todd Grimshaw, becomes another broken reed, just as Rita Fairclough did in the 1980s - all to highlight men = bad, women = good, persecuted lovelies feminist-influenced trendy agendas. All based on feminist-influenced 'statistics' and the hate mill of so-called 'UK' 'politicians' - like Jess Phillips. D.S. Swain's pathetic, misandrist monologue (the Duluth Model? Women's in-group bias? Male chivalry? Lack of support for abused men? Family courts bias? False allegations? Men's lives ruined without proof?) was ...

Mad Dogs and Englishmen? In this case it's Mad Dogs and an Englishwoman! Jess Phillips spews a load of emotional vitriol and misandry and gets away with it every time. Women's own group bias and male chivalry see to that. The so-called 'UK' Parliament (asymmetric national devolution) has become a nightmare. Jess likes to make out she has a UK remit (calling an absurd 'national emergency'), but her powers only extend to England and Wales. Apologies to the sensitive if this blog post seems a little ranty. Jess Phillips is highly emotional and proudly 'gobby' when it comes to her own agenda, so I've echoed her style a little - but with far more objectivity!  By the way, I'm an old socialist, not 'Right Wing'. The modern day is so lazy in classifying people who don't blindly follow the herd and go 'baaa' in time with each other. English MP Jess Phillips is mad. She was weaned (workwise) on misandrist dogma, and is now a ranting, h...

Albert Square - AKA the 'Misandry Mile' - like most UK soap operas. EastEnders , the BBC's 'flagship' soap has just done a 'deep dive' into the 'manosphere'. Oh, great. Men's rights, misandry, Warren Farrell, Karen Straughan, William Collins and Janice Fiamengo? Nope. It was a misandrist hatchet job, designed to show that women and girls are perfect, 'oppressed' lovelies, and all men's problems are their own fault. The Nazi-esque, gender narcissism of women and the devout chivalry of men. Fortunately, not many people watch EastEnders or the documentary, which was a bizarre concoction of misandry and a parody of serious reporting. Misogyny? Criticising a female politician and any male act that disagrees with feminism. Misandry? Ignoring the fact that men do the vast majority of glass cellar jobs which uphold our infrastructure, are 95% of workplace deaths, suffer domestic violence with hardly any shelters for them - or their children, ...

Adolescence , the recent Netflix drama shown in the UK about a boy stabbing a girl, has sent feminists, chivalrous men and the chattering classes in general, including the media, politicians and some academics, into a frenzy of misandry. Of course, our girls (angels without wings) deserve every protection from boys (monsters incarnate) based on a piece of fiction based on a slightly different, isolated incident. Many people, men and women, question the narrative, but the likes of Jess Phillips, who laughed at the notion that men's issues, like the suicide rate, should be raised in parliament, and Keir Starmer, the UK's Prime Minister (although a lot of his domestic legislation does not encompass the entire UK) are beating the drums to protect our angels without wings and to demonise schoolboys. Suffer the little children... Society is clearly extremely unwell. But why? My own theory is that the impulse to protect women sprang from necessity, as did the female aversity to any n...

Women=good, men=bad - and we must prove that at any cost to the "justice" system. Bettina talks to two real police officers about their role in being forced to enforce narcissistic, misandrist feminist infested "justice". Even at this point, the female police officer is still deluded enough to believe that feminism was once good. I recommend a good course of Janice Fiamengo and Karen Straughan. Examine what happened in the early years, what was said, what the system was actually like - and just how hard it was on the vast majority of men. Back to the present, and you don't believe that domestic violence investigations are so biased where you live? You live in England, America, Canada, France? Take a long, hard look at how the system IS biased in your own area. Feminist narcissism and misandry is everywhere.

                                  When history looks back at this era, the actions of the likes of smirking, own-gender-adoring Jess Phillips and Yvette Cooper and their hideous discrimination against men and boys will be plain to see, as will the male attitude of 'let women do whatever they want - they are the priority,' born of chivalry. The future is hopeful in that way, as society is bound to see that women are not sainted and blameless. They are human. And they abuse power and are prone to extreme narcissism. We were rather shocked that England now has a Minister for Safeguarding hateful, one-sided attitudes. But how appropriate that it is Jess Phillips, who laughed at the notion that the issue of male suicides should be looked at in the so-called 'UK' Parliament. And every year takes a one-sided list of UK deaths to the 'UK' Parliament. Her own sex/gender is lovely, and due every protection. It's ...

Picture the scene: your loved one has Stage 4 cancer. He/she is being nursed by you and carers at home. He/she is in a great deal of pain, which oral medication is not solving. You phone your local community nurses and hear a taped message before being placed in a queue, telling you that, amongst other things, "abuse" will not be tolerated, the NHS has 'zero tolerance' for such a (beastly) thing. So, you are stressed out by your partner's pain, have been up all night, and let fly with an expletive at what you deem the unhelpful attitude of the staff you are talking to on the phone, or simply become disgruntled by it. Believe us, unfeeling, unhelpful busybodies, who lecture, ignore what you say, and seem to have had the training of a 1950s nursing auxiliary, do exist. Misandry is also rife.  The bigoted feminist toolbox has labelled men as 'toxic' if they are even slightly off. Add to the picture. You naturally swear a lot, you are worn down by your partner...

Do not make negative views about trendy, misandrist, equity not equality, and therefore racist initiatives - which purport to be the opposite - public at Duke Divinity School. You will be demonised and ousted by the self-regarding, 'proud', hate-riddled ideologues running the show, like Duke Dean Professor Elaine Heath. Professor Heath was apparently 'proud' to be hosting a woke, ideology-ridden, misandrist initiative at Duke. Isn't pride a sin according to the Christian faith? Watch the video presented by Janice Fiamengo. Do YOU think Professor Heath has anything to be proud of in this matter?

From the International Conference on Men's Issues, 2014: 'There has never been a women's movement. It was not a women's movement. It wasn't about women. It was about a handful of powerful Marxist women turning on men of the Left and brilliantly deciding that they would create a billion dollar industry.'  - Erin Pizzey, founder of the first women's refuge in the world.

If a young man and woman are drunk and sexual acts occur, does this mean that the man is guilty of rape?  The hateful feminist rhetoric that all heterosexual sex is violence against women is absurd. It's all very well to be a hate-consumed woman who takes her bile out on the male sex, but not terribly practical to endorse her views when it comes to continuing the species. A lot of the women behind the feminist rage are of this ilk, seeking to demonise men and brainwash other women. And chivalrous men, rushing to the party, desperate to pedestal women, are no help at all. Janice Fiamengo reviews one case in which the men was 'responsible', a 'rapist', and served prison time with a permanent stain on his character, and the woman was a completely innocent 'victim'. This is not justice.

Feminists are as strong as men, they are equal, they can do all the male jobs (not keen on the glass cellar ones) and they are out there kicking male butt - or being hideously misandrist as we call it round here. But feminists are also soft, fragile, in need of protection. Even as much as a glance can reduce them to trembling panic. They are entitled to have any feelings they have about male intentions taken as fact. Due process? No!  Perhaps a return to the Olde England days of chaperones might be needed? Feminists truly do need protection against the merest glance from men. They never do wrong themselves, women don't, and there is not a hint of misandry, neurosis or narcissism in their attitudes. Of course, the skewed and cherry picked stats, the Patriarchy myth and all the paraphernalia of the Feminist ideology helps them immensely in gaining highly unreasonable support from men - who, oddly enough, seem to want to meet women's every demand, even when it's stark staring ...

English men's advocate Rick Bradford takes us through the reasons for the Gender Empathy Gap, male disposability, deep rooted in history, and possible solutions for fathers: This was my talk for Momentum 2021: The Canadian National Men's Issues Conference (11 December 2021). The "how to defeat it" bit is more poetic license than reality, I'm afraid - but it's the topic I was asked to address (bit of a hospital pass really).

In Episode 28 of the Fiamengo File , Professor Fiamengo discusses the modus operandi used by feminists to silence or destroy their critics. The example of Sage Gerard, who endured years of organized persecution at the hands of faculty at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, is used as a case study.

Women don't make false allegations, and are immediately victims on their own say so, while men are immediately perpetrators. There's nothing 'alleged' about it. Away goes due legal process while, on university campuses, narcissistic and brainwashed female students shriek 'TOXIC MASCULINITY!'  The fact that the majority backs this highly discriminatory and nonsensical shriek reveals the gynocentric nature of our society, and the toxicity and narcissism of the feminist movement in one fell swoop. Feminists and their chivalrous supporters - all shrieking from a nice, safe infrastructure overwhelmingly maintained by men in glass cellar jobs. Diana Davison, advocate for the falsely accused, gives her views in the video above.

Diana Davison: Bad relationships are now becoming a crime - but women are always the victims, never the guilty party. And God Forbid these “victims” have to testify in a court of law to get “justice.” Coercive control is a dangerous new legal concept affecting more countries than Canada.

In this video from a few years ago, Diana Davison takes us into the world of 'experts' who back any accusations of rape by men against women. Any. Upping the number of convictions is their only care, because we all know women are always truthful and so 'innocent until proven guilty' should not apply to men accused of rape.  There's something very non-objective and slobbering over the way the 'expert' in the video compares alleged rape victims to her adorable dog, Sophie. It doesn't seem at all healthy to us. Listen to Diana and see why she says: 'Why do we allow “experts” in court who equate women to their pet dog? Get these charlatans out of the courtroom.'

Things ain't what they used to be! But is the past as we see it actually what it was? No. Feminism is a major example of how history is distorted and ideologies like feminism produce fresh nightmare eras, revelled in by the unjust.

Trying to attend a talk on men's issues in a higher education institution can easily result in being told you are 'F***** scum' by extremely entitled, brainwashed and bigoted students. This is the state of our universities. The hate religion of feminism rules, having taken the already gynocentric nature of our society to ridiculous extremes. Janice Fiamengo shares her experiences as a fledgling men's rights champion.

We've never read Harry Potter or seen a film, so we can't judge her writing skills, but JK Rowling strikes us as somebody of below average intelligence and very bigoted when it comes to talking about life and yet her fantasy writings seem to make her feel qualified to speak out on anything she fancies. Born in 1965, like me, Rowling seems to know very little about feminism. The shrieks of 'TRANS-WOMEN ARE PREVERTS WHO WANT TO ABUSE WOMEN!' seem to appeal to her, as does the notion that men are less trustworthy than women as carers, nurses, etc. Rowling, of course, fails to make comparisons with her own gender unless it's the fact she believes she and others of her kind are 'sugar and spice and all things nice'. She does, of course, make her queenly pronouncements to an audience of adorers, who love her fantasy tales, and in a comfortable environment largely provided by glass cellar job men upkeeping the infrastructure. Amazing. Rowling tends not to see much ...