Caroline Dinenage has smirked at male issues for a long time and appears to be in love with herself and her gender. She once said (with a trademark smirk) that some women believed international men's day was every day. How so? Ignorance of male health issues? Glass cellar job fatalities? Parenting rights? Lack of support for male victims of domestic violence? The male suicide rate? Male genital mutilation in this country? This Government is full of misandrists - and care minister Caroline Dinenage is just another of those. While many of us know that the whole of society is garnered towards 'SHE', Dinenage denigrates the work of dedicated male doctors, who work longer hours, and says, of course this is all down to 'inequality'. Sadly, Ms Dinenage, choosing motherhood is a lifestyle choice and caring responsibilities are not the preserve of women only. We cannot have doctors beggaring about and not being available, not being able to commit to study, etc. We nee...

Did you know that before the invention of hoovers, dish washers, etc, women were virtually slaves in their own homes? The men, meanwhile, were out having a high old time, enjoying themselves. I mean - LOL! “It doesn’t matter whether the victim’s a man or a woman, it doesn’t matter whether the perpetrator is a man or a woman, everybody should be treated the same, surely that’s the whole point of gender equality – everybody should be treated the same irrespective of their gender.” Philip Davies, MP, on equality. Caroline Lucas, MP, gave her views on Philip's desire to join the "Women and Equalities Committee" at Westminster: “The day you’re a minority Philip, a white Anglo Saxon man, I don’t think so.” Oh dear. Poor Philip Davies, vilified as a misogynist and a “white Anglo Saxon male”! Beyond the pale, eh? After all he’s not a minority so why should he be on the Women and Equalities Committee at Westminster? Well, oddly enough, I thought there were mo...

I sat on the bus a few years back and saw a poster on there for Cancer Research UK's Race For Life. Two women, in boxing gloves, about to punch a man. The message was horrendously explicit: Men are a cancer, women are fighting it. "Don't talk so daft!" you might say. OK, let's reverse the idea. A poster for a male-only charity run, showing two men about to punch a woman. The are men are running to help "beat cancer". Would that be all right? Of course it wouldn't. So much of the feminine saintliness and past oppression "facts" beloved of many "women's rights" activists is built on shifty statistics and twisted facts. Take Emmeline Pankhurst. Such a heroine! Really? Then why did she support votes for wealthy women only? Why would she never go into prison for activist misdeeds, but let others do so? Why did she harass men to go to war? Just what was this woman? Not a saint, not by any means. In fact, far...