Do not make negative views about trendy, misandrist, equity not equality, and therefore racist initiatives - which purport to be the opposite - public at Duke Divinity School. You will be demonised and ousted by the self-regarding, 'proud', hate-riddled ideologues running the show, like Duke Dean Professor Elaine Heath. Professor Heath was apparently 'proud' to be hosting a woke, ideology-ridden, misandrist initiative at Duke. Isn't pride a sin according to the Christian faith? Watch the video presented by Janice Fiamengo. Do YOU think Professor Heath has anything to be proud of in this matter?

From the International Conference on Men's Issues, 2014: 'There has never been a women's movement. It was not a women's movement. It wasn't about women. It was about a handful of powerful Marxist women turning on men of the Left and brilliantly deciding that they would create a billion dollar industry.'  - Erin Pizzey, founder of the first women's refuge in the world.

If a young man and woman are drunk and sexual acts occur, does this mean that the man is guilty of rape?  The hateful feminist rhetoric that all heterosexual sex is violence against women is absurd. It's all very well to be a hate-consumed woman who takes her bile out on the male sex, but not terribly practical to endorse her views when it comes to continuing the species. A lot of the women behind the feminist rage are of this ilk, seeking to demonise men and brainwash other women. And chivalrous men, rushing to the party, desperate to pedestal women, are no help at all. Janice Fiamengo reviews one case in which the men was 'responsible', a 'rapist', and served prison time with a permanent stain on his character, and the woman was a completely innocent 'victim'. This is not justice.

Feminists are as strong as men, they are equal, they can do all the male jobs (not keen on the glass cellar ones) and they are out there kicking male butt - or being hideously misandrist as we call it round here. But feminists are also soft, fragile, in need of protection. Even as much as a glance can reduce them to trembling panic. They are entitled to have any feelings they have about male intentions taken as fact. Due process? No!  Perhaps a return to the Olde England days of chaperones might be needed? Feminists truly do need protection against the merest glance from men. They never do wrong themselves, women don't, and there is not a hint of misandry, neurosis or narcissism in their attitudes. Of course, the skewed and cherry picked stats, the Patriarchy myth and all the paraphernalia of the Feminist ideology helps them immensely in gaining highly unreasonable support from men - who, oddly enough, seem to want to meet women's every demand, even when it's stark staring ...

English men's advocate Rick Bradford takes us through the reasons for the Gender Empathy Gap, male disposability, deep rooted in history, and possible solutions for fathers: This was my talk for Momentum 2021: The Canadian National Men's Issues Conference (11 December 2021). The "how to defeat it" bit is more poetic license than reality, I'm afraid - but it's the topic I was asked to address (bit of a hospital pass really).

In Episode 28 of the Fiamengo File , Professor Fiamengo discusses the modus operandi used by feminists to silence or destroy their critics. The example of Sage Gerard, who endured years of organized persecution at the hands of faculty at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, is used as a case study.

Women don't make false allegations, and are immediately victims on their own say so, while men are immediately perpetrators. There's nothing 'alleged' about it. Away goes due legal process while, on university campuses, narcissistic and brainwashed female students shriek 'TOXIC MASCULINITY!'  The fact that the majority backs this highly discriminatory and nonsensical shriek reveals the gynocentric nature of our society, and the toxicity and narcissism of the feminist movement in one fell swoop. Feminists and their chivalrous supporters - all shrieking from a nice, safe infrastructure overwhelmingly maintained by men in glass cellar jobs. Diana Davison, advocate for the falsely accused, gives her views in the video above.

Diana Davison: Bad relationships are now becoming a crime - but women are always the victims, never the guilty party. And God Forbid these “victims” have to testify in a court of law to get “justice.” Coercive control is a dangerous new legal concept affecting more countries than Canada.

In this video from a few years ago, Diana Davison takes us into the world of 'experts' who back any accusations of rape by men against women. Any. Upping the number of convictions is their only care, because we all know women are always truthful and so 'innocent until proven guilty' should not apply to men accused of rape.  There's something very non-objective and slobbering over the way the 'expert' in the video compares alleged rape victims to her adorable dog, Sophie. It doesn't seem at all healthy to us. Listen to Diana and see why she says: 'Why do we allow “experts” in court who equate women to their pet dog? Get these charlatans out of the courtroom.'

Things ain't what they used to be! But is the past as we see it actually what it was? No. Feminism is a major example of how history is distorted and ideologies like feminism produce fresh nightmare eras, revelled in by the unjust.