Fiona Hathorn, Studies Which Leap To Conclusions, & Women Overvaluing Themselves - The Fiamengo File Episode 39

Apparently, women undervalue themselves when it comes to workplace salaries. Or do they? While it fits the constant harping and hate of the feminist movement to shriek this view, is it really true? And, if women as qualified and committed as men will ask for less, why don't companies simply employ only women and save oodles of dosh?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Minister For Safeguarding Misandrist Attitudes & Female Narcissism: Jess Phillips!

Image
                                  When history looks back at this era, the actions of the likes of smirking, own-gender-adoring Jess Phillips and Yvette Cooper and their hideous discrimination against men and boys will be plain to see, as will the male attitude of 'let women do whatever they want - they are the priority,' born of chivalry. The future is hopeful in that way, as society is bound to see that women are not sainted and blameless. They are human. And they abuse power and are prone to extreme narcissism. We were rather shocked that England now has a Minister for Safeguarding hateful, one-sided attitudes. But how appropriate that it is Jess Phillips, who laughed at the notion that the issue of male suicides should be looked at in the so-called 'UK' Parliament. And every year takes a one-sided list of UK deaths to the 'UK' Parliament. Her own sex/gender is lovely, and due every protection. It's ...
Read more

Cancer Research UK: Race For Life - So Sexist It's Evil!

Image
I sat on the bus a few years back and saw a poster on there for Cancer Research UK's Race For Life. Two women, in boxing gloves, about to punch a man. The message was horrendously explicit: Men are a cancer, women are fighting it. "Don't talk so daft!" you might say. OK, let's reverse the idea. A poster for a male-only charity run, showing two men about to punch a woman. The are men are running to help "beat cancer". Would that be all right? Of course it wouldn't. So much of the feminine saintliness and past oppression "facts" beloved of many "women's rights" activists is built on shifty statistics and twisted facts. Take Emmeline Pankhurst. Such a heroine! Really? Then why did she support votes for wealthy women only? Why would she never go into prison for activist misdeeds, but let others do so? Why did she harass men to go to war? Just what was this woman? Not a saint, not by any means. In fact, far...
Read more

Penny Mordaunt, 'UK' Government - Women Have More Rights Than Men, But Penny Has Her Head Stuck Up Her Own Sex's Backside...

Image
Penny Mordaunt, now, amazingly, Leader of the House of Commons, is a narcissistic Feminist of the lowest order. And on Twitter she has recently been bringing up the usual illogical claptrap - unquestioned in our land of chivalry and matriarchy:  Today the Leader @PennyMordaunt hosted parliamentarians and civil society leaders working to protect and enhance women's rights and democracy here in the UK and across the world. We are working to create the networks and tools we need to support this fight. Um, well, firstly, women have more rights in the UK than men. Seriously. And if you're going to try and gaslight us about 'historical wrongs', please don't bother. We've read the true facts about the vote, thank you. The suffragettes were often violent, misandrist terrorists. The vote was never simply a right without accountability - many men had the accountabilities but not the vote. Men die younger than women. Women have 'all women shortlists' for posh job...
Read more